<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Transaction Concurrency in CIM in Integration and Testing</title>
    <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Transaction-Concurrency-in-CIM/m-p/23241#M12521</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;For Refund Transactions&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If you are submitting a refund against a previous CIM transaction, the following guidelines apply: &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;- include customerProfileId, customerPaymentProfileId, and transId. &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;- customerShippingAddressId is optional. &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;- creditCardNumberMasked, bankRoutingNumberMasked, and bankAccountNumberMasked do not need to be included, but they will be validated if they are included.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From this context, I'm not sure. I'm leaning towards the money being refunded to the payment profile you choose, but Authorize.net could also be looking for a match against the profiles used in the previous transaction. The only way to find out for sure is to generate a transaction in production live mode, and then try to refund it using a second payment profile. If you get an error, then you know it has to match; if it doesn't, then the refund goes to the profile you choose.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 09:39:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TJPride</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-18T09:39:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Transaction Concurrency in CIM</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Transaction-Concurrency-in-CIM/m-p/23235#M12518</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if say a refund, or void (an action that takes places on a specific transaction id) will use the paymentProfile details that were present at the time of the transaction, or will they be processed against the current values. &amp;nbsp;Meaning that an update to that paymenProfile has taken place since the time of the transaction in question.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:04:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Transaction-Concurrency-in-CIM/m-p/23235#M12518</guid>
      <dc:creator>triprewrac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-18T06:04:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Transaction Concurrency in CIM</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Transaction-Concurrency-in-CIM/m-p/23241#M12521</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;For Refund Transactions&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If you are submitting a refund against a previous CIM transaction, the following guidelines apply: &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;- include customerProfileId, customerPaymentProfileId, and transId. &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;- customerShippingAddressId is optional. &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;- creditCardNumberMasked, bankRoutingNumberMasked, and bankAccountNumberMasked do not need to be included, but they will be validated if they are included.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From this context, I'm not sure. I'm leaning towards the money being refunded to the payment profile you choose, but Authorize.net could also be looking for a match against the profiles used in the previous transaction. The only way to find out for sure is to generate a transaction in production live mode, and then try to refund it using a second payment profile. If you get an error, then you know it has to match; if it doesn't, then the refund goes to the profile you choose.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 09:39:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Transaction-Concurrency-in-CIM/m-p/23241#M12521</guid>
      <dc:creator>TJPride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-18T09:39:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

