<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Checking to see if CC is valid in Integration and Testing</title>
    <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Checking-to-see-if-CC-is-valid/m-p/24023#M12905</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This post would seem to indicate the proper precedure is authorization only and then void:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/News-and-Announcements/Authorize-Net-Support-of-Visa-Mandates/td-p/518" target="_blank"&gt;http://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/News-and-Announcements/Authorize-Net-Support-of-Visa-Mandates/td-p/518&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just updating this thread for more accurate information. Would still like to hear from a mod as to whether capturing the $0.00 or $0.01 authorization would be damaging in some way.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TJPride</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-05T20:46:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Checking to see if CC is valid</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Checking-to-see-if-CC-is-valid/m-p/23721#M12757</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I need to check to see if the credit card is valid. &amp;nbsp;If I do a "authOnlyTransaction" does this show up on the customer bank account as pending? &amp;nbsp;I will not be processing a transaction to go with the "authorize only". &amp;nbsp;I simply wish to check and make sure the credit card is valid. &amp;nbsp;I guess my question is, would the "authOnlyTransaction" work as a method?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:40:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Checking-to-see-if-CC-is-valid/m-p/23721#M12757</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wstar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-28T17:40:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Checking to see if CC is valid</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Checking-to-see-if-CC-is-valid/m-p/23729#M12761</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's an interesting question. The documentation doesn't seem to say whether validation mode uses a full transaction or just an authorization, though I always assumed it was authorize and capture, since authorizations are invisible and there wouldn't necessarily be a point to voiding a $0.00 transaction (Visa). No damage is going to be done by doing a full authorize and capture, in any case, since you're immediately voiding, so you may as well be on the safe side and use that mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Be interested to hear from a mod on this one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:29:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Checking-to-see-if-CC-is-valid/m-p/23729#M12761</guid>
      <dc:creator>TJPride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-28T18:29:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Checking to see if CC is valid</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Checking-to-see-if-CC-is-valid/m-p/24023#M12905</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This post would seem to indicate the proper precedure is authorization only and then void:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/News-and-Announcements/Authorize-Net-Support-of-Visa-Mandates/td-p/518" target="_blank"&gt;http://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/News-and-Announcements/Authorize-Net-Support-of-Visa-Mandates/td-p/518&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just updating this thread for more accurate information. Would still like to hear from a mod as to whether capturing the $0.00 or $0.01 authorization would be damaging in some way.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Checking-to-see-if-CC-is-valid/m-p/24023#M12905</guid>
      <dc:creator>TJPride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-05T20:46:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Checking to see if CC is valid</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Checking-to-see-if-CC-is-valid/m-p/24073#M12925</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to clarify, it is the "Authorization" that actually holds the funds on the customer's account.&amp;nbsp; Essentially, the customer's bank returns an Authorization Code which represents the funds that are approved for you.&amp;nbsp; The "Capture" request tells us to go ahead and settle out the transaction and begins the process of actually transferring those held funds.&amp;nbsp; You are correct that the best method is to authorize for the smallest amount possible ($0.01 on most cards, $0.00 on Visa) and then void the authorization immediately.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:07:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Checking-to-see-if-CC-is-valid/m-p/24073#M12925</guid>
      <dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-06T20:07:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

