<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint in Integration and Testing</title>
    <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27100#M14347</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4 days ago we upgraded to a new server. Since then I am randomly receiving the response reason code of 98. I understand this means we are duplicating fingerprints. However I cannot see how this is possible. I am using a SQL table to insert records for each transaction and in turn using the identity column as my unique sequence number as part of my fingerprint. This number cannot be duplicated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am also logging every page load and writing troubleshooting data to the server hard drive so I can monitor the activity. The logs are stored using a unique transactionID as the filename. I have run test transactions to see if I can replicate this issue by using my browser's back button. I can reproduce the error 98 but the logs for my transaction clearly show the second submission to the Authorize.net gateway. As an additional safeguard to prevent duplication I have now also begun appending the transaction ID unto the unique sequence number before creating the fingerprint. I am still receiving these errors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also I am experiencing some transactions that are being sent to the gateway but my receipt page is never requested afterwards. I am hoping someone else may have experienced this and can help me identify the cause.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:33:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-12T19:33:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27100#M14347</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4 days ago we upgraded to a new server. Since then I am randomly receiving the response reason code of 98. I understand this means we are duplicating fingerprints. However I cannot see how this is possible. I am using a SQL table to insert records for each transaction and in turn using the identity column as my unique sequence number as part of my fingerprint. This number cannot be duplicated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am also logging every page load and writing troubleshooting data to the server hard drive so I can monitor the activity. The logs are stored using a unique transactionID as the filename. I have run test transactions to see if I can replicate this issue by using my browser's back button. I can reproduce the error 98 but the logs for my transaction clearly show the second submission to the Authorize.net gateway. As an additional safeguard to prevent duplication I have now also begun appending the transaction ID unto the unique sequence number before creating the fingerprint. I am still receiving these errors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also I am experiencing some transactions that are being sent to the gateway but my receipt page is never requested afterwards. I am hoping someone else may have experienced this and can help me identify the cause.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:33:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27100#M14347</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-12T19:33:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27102#M14348</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;However I cannot see how this is possible. I am using a SQL table to insert records for each transaction and in turn using the identity column as my unique sequence number as part of my fingerprint. This number cannot be duplicated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What the stored procedure look like?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am also logging every page load and writing troubleshooting data to the server hard drive so I can monitor the activity. The logs are stored using a unique transactionID as the filename.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It there a transactionID in the response when you get error 98?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an additional safeguard to prevent duplication I have now also begun appending the transaction ID unto the unique sequence number before creating the fingerprint. I am still receiving these errors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the transactionID is from the transaction, so it is not there when you create the fingerprint.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also I am experiencing some transactions that are being sent to the gateway but my receipt page is never requested afterwards. I am hoping someone else may have experienced this and can help me identify the cause.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You mean the x_relay_response_url never get call? or are you doing something else?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:37:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27102#M14348</guid>
      <dc:creator>RaynorC1emen7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-12T20:37:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27104#M14349</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;You mean the x_relay_response_url never get call? or are you doing something else?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In some cases yes.&amp;nbsp; I have 3 pages that handle the transaction:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Shipping &amp;amp; Billing page - collects the customer shipping and billing data.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Gateway page -&amp;nbsp;validates the shipping &amp;amp; billing data, generates the fingerprint and sends the customer to the gateway&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Receipt page - processes the data from Authorize.net and displays a receipt for the customer.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;The logs clearly show the first two page loads.&amp;nbsp; In some cases the receipt page is loaded but the code provided by Authorize.net is 98.&amp;nbsp; Even though the logs show clearly that there was only one post to the gateway.&amp;nbsp; In these other cases we get an email that the script timed out but the logs have no entries that the receipt page was ever requested.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:16:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27104#M14349</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-12T21:16:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27114#M14354</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm still not clear what unique name do you use for your log as there is no transactionID until the receipt page. And I assume you always append to the log file.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:20:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27114#M14354</guid>
      <dc:creator>RaynorC1emen7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-13T01:20:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27118#M14356</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;I'm still not clear what unique name do you use for your log as there is no transactionID until the receipt page. And I assume you always append to the log file.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The transactionID I was referring to is my own, not the one Authorize.net assigns to our transactions.&amp;nbsp; My&amp;nbsp;website generates a transactionID as soon as a customer places an item in their shopping cart.&amp;nbsp; I use this transactionID as the filename for my log files to track the progress of the transaction through the checkout process.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:44:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27118#M14356</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-13T01:44:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27120#M14357</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I should add, about 98% of my transactions are successfully processed, or at least I receive the error code that the credit card is declined.&amp;nbsp; It is this 2% that is causing me grief with the code 98 or not loading the receipt at all.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:47:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27120#M14357</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-13T01:47:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27124#M14359</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think it time to call support with your log info on code 98.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:30:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27124#M14359</guid>
      <dc:creator>RaynorC1emen7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-13T11:30:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27136#M14365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I appreciate your time.&amp;nbsp; I am on the phone with support now.&amp;nbsp; I will&amp;nbsp;report back&amp;nbsp;when&amp;nbsp;we find out the source of the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:34:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27136#M14365</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-13T16:34:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27154#M14374</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When you state that you are collecting the "Billing Information" on your site before directing to Authorize.Net, does this mean that you are collecting the card details as well? If you are, then it sounds like you may be using the DPM flow for SIM.&amp;nbsp; If this is the case, one possible cause of this is your customers using the back button if your relay response page is taking too long to load.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:09:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27154#M14374</guid>
      <dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-13T22:09:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27302#M14447</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;one possible cause of this is your customers using the back button if your relay response page is taking too long to load.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are collecting the credit card data just before sending the customer to the gateway.&amp;nbsp; When our customers use the back button&amp;nbsp;the the log files clearly reflect this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But what we are mostly experiencing now is a "script timeout" message being displayed to the customer even though our receipt page is bot being requested.&amp;nbsp; In turn we receive a "Merchant Email Receipt" message from Authorize.net which includes our transaction details.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I look up the logs for any of these transactions either the receipt page is never loaded or it is loaded and shows as a failed transaction code 98.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been logging these occurrences since last Tuesday:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tuesday: 35&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wednesday: 14&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thursday: 12&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Friday: 7&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Weekend total: 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yesterday: 15&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When we migrated to the new server we also changed IP addresses.&amp;nbsp; Until yesterday the instances of this problem steadily decreased.&amp;nbsp; My original theory was that Authorize.net has name servers that have cached our old IP address.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;That would explain the "script timeout" messages since they failed to load the receipt.&amp;nbsp; That would also explain why I am not seeing logs to reflect the duplicate gateway submissions or the users' use of the&amp;nbsp;back button.&amp;nbsp; But for name servers to cache an IP address for over 10 days would be very bizarre.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Support has escalated this to engineering as of&amp;nbsp;June 14th but the engineer has not yet attempted to contact me regarding this ongoing problem.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27302#M14447</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-19T16:42:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27324#M14458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am very disappointed in the customer service regarding this issue.&amp;nbsp; This had been&amp;nbsp;escalated to Engineering on 6/13/2012.&amp;nbsp; I was told I would hear from an Engineer within 24-48 hours.&amp;nbsp; I never heard back.&amp;nbsp; I called again on the 18th.&amp;nbsp; I was told again I can expect a call from an Engineer.&amp;nbsp; I called again today and was told this has now been escalated to the Products Department.&amp;nbsp; No correspondence whatsoever.&amp;nbsp; No notes&amp;nbsp;from the Engineering department as to why it was escalated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can only speculate that they have discovered something wrong with the product and that is why it has been escalated.&amp;nbsp; Otherwise I should have heard from someone in Engineering to&amp;nbsp;discuss my logs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:45:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27324#M14458</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-20T16:45:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27352#M14471</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've finally gotten a communication with Jeremy O with customer service.&amp;nbsp; Here is his response:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;-----Original Message----- &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;From: Authorize.Net Merchant Support &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:19 AM &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;To: CC_WSP &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Subject: x_relay_url coding (#8842-300716039-1196)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;﻿&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;The reason why your customer's are being directed to the wrong website is because the coding is incorrect for the x_relay_url which is done in the coding as well as in the Account Settings page under response/receipt URL's.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;CC_WSP needs to correct this coding in order for customers to be directed to the correct websites.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;﻿&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;The time out error is because the script is handling other information before it communicates with Authorize.Net.&amp;nbsp; The script must have Authorize.Net as the top priority in order to resolve the time out error.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;﻿&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Thank you for contacting Customer Support.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Regards,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Jeremy O Authorize.Net Customer Support&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;-----/ Original Message-----&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Here is my response to Jeremy:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeremy O,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have not used the x_relay_url for many years.&amp;nbsp; At least since we implemented the Simple Integration Method.&amp;nbsp; We were instructed to instead use x_adc_url to store that value.&amp;nbsp; If the coding is incorrect then how is it possible that 95% of the transactions are successfully completed and the correct receipt is being displayed to the customer?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The timeout error is triggered in many cases without any communication with our scripts.&amp;nbsp; Our scripts are programmed to collect the POST from Authorize.net and process it accordingly.&amp;nbsp; We have FREB logs on the server to indicate if this script fails.&amp;nbsp; The script also writes logs to the server hard drive so we can tell exactly where an error occurs in the event of an Authorize.net "script timed out" message.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This coding has been in place for years.&amp;nbsp; It was not until our server migration on June 8th that these problems began occurring.&amp;nbsp; As I explained on my open ticket #1-42037237, it appears that you have name servers that have cached our old IP address which they are attempting to load our receipt.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeremy, I had begun this ticket on June 13th and escalated it to Engineering.&amp;nbsp; I was told by Authorize.net personnel that on the 19th the Engineering department escalated it to the Products department.&amp;nbsp; If what what you are saying is correct, why would the Enginieering department escalate this to the Products department?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am willing to do a conference call at any time.&amp;nbsp; I will set aside everything to fix this issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;﻿&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;﻿&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:24:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27352#M14471</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-21T17:24:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27492#M14535</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I apologize for the miscommunication on this issue. Customer Support does not really have any way to have an engineer contact you about this issue--it is not a level of support we can offer as our engineers are focusing on maintaining current service levels and adding new services.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But since you say you are not reusing the fingerprint hash, I would like to know if you have tried setting up your code to display or log&amp;nbsp;the values you're submitting for x_login, x_fp_sequence, x_fp_timestamp, x_amount, and x_fp_hash, just prior to&amp;nbsp;the customer going to our Hosted Payment Form,&amp;nbsp;to confirm that in fact you aren't resending it. RRC 98 is very specific, and while I understand your concern, there's no other condition that would cause RRC 98 save for a repeated fingerprint hash, so that must be our focus here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:45:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27492#M14535</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lilith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-26T15:45:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27838#M14700</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Lilith,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have added an XMLHttpRequest just as the gateway is loading to log the information being sent to Authorize.net and I am seeing duplicate fingerprints.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was just testing an order through my system and I reproduced the problem of Authorize.net not loading the receipt.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the message that is being displayed instead:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;An error occurred while trying to report this transaction to the merchant. An e-mail has been sent to the merchant informing them of the error. The following is the result of the attempt to charge your credit card. &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; This transaction has been approved.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;It is advisable for you to contact the merchant to verify that you will receive the product or service.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked my logs in IIS and there was no corresponding request for my receipt made by Authorize.net for this transaction.&amp;nbsp; Every other instance of my receipt loading in the IIS logs show a status 200.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I&amp;nbsp;stated my logs show when a user uses the back button I was mistaken.&amp;nbsp; I used my back button and the script sent me back to the gateway and I received the code 98.&amp;nbsp; The IIS logs only show&amp;nbsp;my initial loading of the gateway and then the second call to the receipt which logged the response code 98.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the reason code 98 is just a symptom of the problem.&amp;nbsp; The main problem I am finding is the failure of Authorize.net to load the receipt.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:17:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/27838#M14700</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-11T17:17:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/28096#M14820</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have spent the last few days working with my hosting provider and they have been analyzing the traffic to and from our server.&amp;nbsp; They have confirmed that no traffic from Authorize.net was detected at the time when Authorize.net reports&amp;nbsp;that "an error occurred."&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/28096#M14820</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-20T23:32:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/28110#M14827</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We just started experiencing the same problem CC_WSP describes...where the receipt page is seemingly randomly not being loaded and the following is shown to the customer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;An error occurred while trying to report this transaction to the merchant. An e-mail has been sent to the merchant informing them of the error. The following is the result of the attempt to charge your credit card.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This transaction has been approved.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is advisable for you to contact the merchant to verify that you will receive the product or service.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most transactions get processed just fine, but every so often one encounters this issue. &amp;nbsp;The error email sent back notes that our "script timed out" - however, I've tested with forcing the receipt script to take at least 10 seconds to return a response, and transactions went through just fine...so a 'time out' doesn't seem to be the culprit.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:39:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/28110#M14827</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcstraymond</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-21T01:39:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/28112#M14828</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Apologies - turns out the issue was a problem in our script that was actually returning a 404 error.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 02:50:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/28112#M14828</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcstraymond</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-21T02:50:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/28124#M14834</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;marcstraymond,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm curious, how would your script periodically return a 404 (file not found)&amp;nbsp;error?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my case the receipt is not even being requested or posted to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CC&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 20:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/28124#M14834</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-21T20:37:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/28672#M15093</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This issue mysteriously stopped occuring on Friday 8/3/2012.&amp;nbsp; All transactions are now being completed with Authorize.net correctly requesting our receipt.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:04:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/28672#M15093</guid>
      <dc:creator>CC_WSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-09T17:04:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIM Reason Code 98: Due to duplicate fingerprint</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/76380#M47711</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If your Apply Pay supportted regions is ready to america, then you'll need to check with American Express&lt;A href="https://jacobmartin.com/" target="_self"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;. Second, in case you are not signed into a checking out tool with an iCloud account that supports a sandbox user.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 19:03:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/SIM-Reason-Code-98-Due-to-duplicate-fingerprint/m-p/76380#M47711</guid>
      <dc:creator>taers324</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-19T19:03:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

