<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: asynchronous notifications after manual changing of transaction state in Integration and Testing</title>
    <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/asynchronous-notifications-after-manual-changing-of-transaction/m-p/32200#M16767</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks for your quick reply, yes, I beleive we can use that approach, not perfect but fit our needs ))&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:04:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dmch</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-17T16:04:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>asynchronous notifications after manual changing of transaction state</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/asynchronous-notifications-after-manual-changing-of-transaction/m-p/32198#M16765</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using Java and AIM. According to the documentation transaction can be marked for review&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Table 15 Response Codes&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Response&lt;BR /&gt;Code Description&lt;BR /&gt;1 This transaction has been approved.&lt;BR /&gt;2 This transaction has been declined.&lt;BR /&gt;3 There has been an error processing this transaction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;4 This transaction is being held for review.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I understnadn transaction can be reviwed&amp;nbsp; and approved later by merchant, I am wondering if there is any way to notify us about changes like that one. We keep all trasnaction on our side and want to have them in actual state.&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/asynchronous-notifications-after-manual-changing-of-transaction/m-p/32198#M16765</guid>
      <dc:creator>dmch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-17T15:37:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: asynchronous notifications after manual changing of transaction state</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/asynchronous-notifications-after-manual-changing-of-transaction/m-p/32199#M16766</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I remember it was asked a while back. And if I remember correctly, the answer was there isn't anything that will send a notifications. But since you do have the transactionID when it was first process, use that to check the status thru the&lt;A href="http://developer.authorize.net/api/transaction_details/" target="_self"&gt;&amp;nbsp;Transaction Details API &lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, there would only be held for review, if the merchant account is set to hold transaction on certain conditions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/asynchronous-notifications-after-manual-changing-of-transaction/m-p/32199#M16766</guid>
      <dc:creator>RaynorC1emen7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-17T15:49:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: asynchronous notifications after manual changing of transaction state</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/asynchronous-notifications-after-manual-changing-of-transaction/m-p/32200#M16767</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks for your quick reply, yes, I beleive we can use that approach, not perfect but fit our needs ))&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:04:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/asynchronous-notifications-after-manual-changing-of-transaction/m-p/32200#M16767</guid>
      <dc:creator>dmch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-17T16:04:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

