<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AIM and AVS/CCV in Integration and Testing</title>
    <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/AIM-and-AVS-CCV/m-p/33465#M17975</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ColorBandedcontent" style="position: relative; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 3px; padding-right: 3px; clear: both; padding-top: 0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="imcontent" style="margin-left: 12px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;Once you have successfully charged a customer's account, you can specify future payments as "recurring" payments using the x_recurring_billing flag. This flag advises the processor that you already have a relationship with the customer and in most cases causes the processor to bypass address verification.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Within the Authorize.Net system, it isn't possible to turn on and off address verification on a per transaction basis. However, if the processor says that it is "not applicable", we will not decline the transaction.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;Joy&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 22:37:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-12T22:37:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AIM and AVS/CCV</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/AIM-and-AVS-CCV/m-p/33303#M17825</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would like some transactions to be run through the AVS/CCV&amp;nbsp;fraud filter, and other transactions not be run through this filter.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If a transaction is submitting with an address field or CCV&amp;nbsp;field, does it bypass the Fraud filters?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like the AVS/CCVFraud filters to apply to initial transactions. Once the first transaction is complete, verified and stored, the CC data could be used for future billing without being subject to CCV/AVS filters. This would reduce failures due to address changes and would keep me PCI compliant by not requiring me to store CCV&amp;nbsp;codes while still preventing fraud when the card is first used.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would be the best way to do this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 07:03:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/AIM-and-AVS-CCV/m-p/33303#M17825</guid>
      <dc:creator>voidix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-04T07:03:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AIM and AVS/CCV</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/AIM-and-AVS-CCV/m-p/33465#M17975</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ColorBandedcontent" style="position: relative; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 3px; padding-right: 3px; clear: both; padding-top: 0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="imcontent" style="margin-left: 12px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;Once you have successfully charged a customer's account, you can specify future payments as "recurring" payments using the x_recurring_billing flag. This flag advises the processor that you already have a relationship with the customer and in most cases causes the processor to bypass address verification.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Within the Authorize.Net system, it isn't possible to turn on and off address verification on a per transaction basis. However, if the processor says that it is "not applicable", we will not decline the transaction.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="font-family: MS Shell Dlg 2; direction: ltr; color: #000000; font-size: 9pt;"&gt;Joy&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 22:37:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/AIM-and-AVS-CCV/m-p/33465#M17975</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-12T22:37:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

