<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DPM allowable merchant-defined field values in Integration and Testing</title>
    <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/DPM-allowable-merchant-defined-field-values/m-p/40780#M22128</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm using sessions with DPM in test mode. &amp;nbsp;I want to know whether a card was accepted or rejected for a given session.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DPM's relay response usually starts a new session. &amp;nbsp;To correlate the response to the original session, I&amp;nbsp;put a hash of my&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;session ID in a merchant-defined field called "my_session_id". &amp;nbsp;One example of a hashed session id is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"cfaebe70125a6e64990f15b9b7739d22a1e9f2f1". &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately, AN converts that hash to an asterisk when&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the transaction fails. &amp;nbsp;It&amp;nbsp;doesn't alter it when the transaction succeeds. &amp;nbsp;Obviously, I can't correlate to the original session&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if AN changes it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reading other posts, AN will convert certain merchant-field contents to an asterisk if it looks like unallowable data (credit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;card number,&amp;nbsp;etc.) &amp;nbsp;I wonder if a hash falls into that category. &amp;nbsp;I considered&amp;nbsp;changing the merchant-defined field value to a&lt;BR /&gt;date appended&amp;nbsp;with a 5- or 6-digit number, but before I spend the time coding it up, I want to make sure it will work. &amp;nbsp;I'd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;like to know:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. What is a sure-fire format for a session ID that AN will always allow and never convert to an asterisk?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Charles&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>charless</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-04-28T12:33:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DPM allowable merchant-defined field values</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/DPM-allowable-merchant-defined-field-values/m-p/40780#M22128</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm using sessions with DPM in test mode. &amp;nbsp;I want to know whether a card was accepted or rejected for a given session.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DPM's relay response usually starts a new session. &amp;nbsp;To correlate the response to the original session, I&amp;nbsp;put a hash of my&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;session ID in a merchant-defined field called "my_session_id". &amp;nbsp;One example of a hashed session id is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"cfaebe70125a6e64990f15b9b7739d22a1e9f2f1". &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately, AN converts that hash to an asterisk when&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the transaction fails. &amp;nbsp;It&amp;nbsp;doesn't alter it when the transaction succeeds. &amp;nbsp;Obviously, I can't correlate to the original session&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if AN changes it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reading other posts, AN will convert certain merchant-field contents to an asterisk if it looks like unallowable data (credit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;card number,&amp;nbsp;etc.) &amp;nbsp;I wonder if a hash falls into that category. &amp;nbsp;I considered&amp;nbsp;changing the merchant-defined field value to a&lt;BR /&gt;date appended&amp;nbsp;with a 5- or 6-digit number, but before I spend the time coding it up, I want to make sure it will work. &amp;nbsp;I'd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;like to know:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. What is a sure-fire format for a session ID that AN will always allow and never convert to an asterisk?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Charles&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/DPM-allowable-merchant-defined-field-values/m-p/40780#M22128</guid>
      <dc:creator>charless</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-28T12:33:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DPM allowable merchant-defined field values</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/DPM-allowable-merchant-defined-field-values/m-p/41046#M22254</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've reported your question&amp;nbsp;to the integration&amp;nbsp;team, but do not yet have an answer.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd recommend subscribing to this topic so that you'll be alerted via email if there are updates. To subscribe, click &lt;STRONG&gt;Topic Options&lt;/STRONG&gt; at the top of this thread and then select &lt;STRONG&gt;Subscribe&lt;/STRONG&gt;. You'll then receive an email once anyone replies to your post.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 21:14:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/DPM-allowable-merchant-defined-field-values/m-p/41046#M22254</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichardH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-14T21:14:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

