topic Re: ECHECK transactions are declined if amount exceeds $100 in Integration and Testing

ECHECK transactions are declined if amount exceeds $100

jacknevitt — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:07:28 GMT

Hello,

I have been assured by the people who set up our merchant account that the ECHECK limit is set at $400. I am using AIM as my integration method and everything works as expected until the check amount exceeds $100, then the transaction is declined with a response code of 2. My x_echeck_type = WEB. My login URL is https://test.authorize.net . Would that make a difference in the allowed check limit?

Thanks

Re: ECHECK transactions are declined if amount exceeds $100

TSdotNet — Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:21:15 GMT

If you dont get an answer to this I would suggest emailing developer@authorize.net as it is a very valid question.

Re: ECHECK transactions are declined if amount exceeds $100

jacknevitt — Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:54:59 GMT

Thanks for getting back to me. I'll wait a little longer but in the meantime, I'll email my question.

Re: ECHECK transactions are declined if amount exceeds $100

spahlke — Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:13:46 GMT

Hi there,

we're running into the exact same problem right now - were you ever able to figure out the reason behind the behavior ?

Thanks
Stephan

Re: ECHECK transactions are declined if amount exceeds $100

RichardH — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:27:09 GMT

We heard this question again from another developer and wanted to remind our community that eCheck.Net is enabled for all sandbox accounts but with low transaction limits: $100 per transaction and $5000.00 monthly. These limits in the sandbox are arbitrary and allow developers to easily test a sucessful transaction (within limits), or decline (above limits).

You can always send a request to raise these limits. If you don’t, it will give you a straight decline if you try to run a transaction that is more than your transaction size limit.

Richard

Re: ECHECK transactions are declined if amount exceeds $100

bitNine — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:32:56 GMT

It makes absolutely no sense to put transaction limits on a developer sandbox, nor does it make any sense to have to request that those limits be increased.

Re: ECHECK transactions are declined if amount exceeds $100

RichardH — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:30:13 GMT

Hello @bitNine

Thanks for the feedback.

The purpose of limits is to provide developers a method to easily test accepted and declined transactions. Any transaction below the limits in the sandbox will process, and any transactions above the limit will decline.

Richard

Re: ECHECK transactions are declined if amount exceeds $100

rfisher — Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:17:41 GMT

If this standard is going to be maintained, it should be better documented and/or highlighted as a warning within the sandbox. My team wasted several hours debugging our application due to echecks being decliened, when the cause was the sandbox declining all charges over $100.

If you're going to impment a standard for the convience of developers, I suggest you do it in a way that doesn't waste hours of developers time.

Re: ECHECK transactions are declined if amount exceeds $100

bobbydoogle — Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:23:13 GMT

I also wasted about 30 minutes debugging this before I found this post. I would highly recommend the error code include that sandbox accounts will decline transactions over $100.