<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Capturing Response Codes - CIM in Integration and Testing</title>
    <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Capturing-Response-Codes-CIM/m-p/46205#M23371</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So from the reply I understand that we would need to use gateway response code, gateway reason code, gateway reason text in directResponse rather than code in message&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please confirm&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:38:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Netizen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-13T12:38:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Capturing Response Codes - CIM</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Capturing-Response-Codes-CIM/m-p/46193#M23365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Response Code list mentioned in CIM Respose Codes is currently mentioned in&amp;nbsp;response&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;message&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e.g. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; I0001&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are also Gateway Response Code, Gateway Reason Code and Gateway Reason Text in&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;validationDirectResponse&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q. 1) Would&amp;nbsp;the &amp;lt;validationDirectResponse&amp;gt; field be always populated in response to createCustomerProfileTransactionRequest to capture associated response code/reason/text?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q.&amp;nbsp;2) Does it make any difference if we capture just the codes received in&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;validationDirectResponse&amp;gt; &amp;amp; ignore &amp;lt;Code&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;Message&amp;gt;?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sarang&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:35:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Capturing-Response-Codes-CIM/m-p/46193#M23365</guid>
      <dc:creator>Netizen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T07:35:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Capturing Response Codes - CIM</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Capturing-Response-Codes-CIM/m-p/46197#M23367</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1)No, the direct response it the transaction response, it the same response as in AIM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If is got a EXXXX error it might not create any transaction&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2)answer in 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Capturing-Response-Codes-CIM/m-p/46197#M23367</guid>
      <dc:creator>RaynorC1emen7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T11:08:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Capturing Response Codes - CIM</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Capturing-Response-Codes-CIM/m-p/46205#M23371</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So from the reply I understand that we would need to use gateway response code, gateway reason code, gateway reason text in directResponse rather than code in message&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please confirm&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:38:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Capturing-Response-Codes-CIM/m-p/46205#M23371</guid>
      <dc:creator>Netizen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T12:38:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Capturing Response Codes - CIM</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Capturing-Response-Codes-CIM/m-p/46207#M23372</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No you need both, because if you are getting EXXXX error, there might not be any validationDirectResponse&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:42:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Capturing-Response-Codes-CIM/m-p/46207#M23372</guid>
      <dc:creator>RaynorC1emen7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T12:42:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

