topic Re: Transaction Details API - Testing different status responses in Integration and Testing

Transaction Details API - Testing different status responses

rreynier — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 02:05:13 GMT

Is there a way to test the different responses the Transaction Details api can respond with. I want to simulate getting the different possible statuses a transaction can have:

authorizedPendingCapture capturedPendingSettlement communicationError refundSettledSuccessfully refundPendingSettlement approvedReview declined couldNotVoid expired generalError pendingFinalSettlement pendingSettlement failedReview settledSuccessfully settlementError underReview updatingSettlement voided FDSPendingReview FDSAuthorizedPendingReview returnedItem chargeback chargebackReversal authorizedPendingRelease

I understand ideally I can stub this out in unit testing, but currently this is not an option. Ideally there are ways to force a transaction status. Ex. transaction id 12937592 always returns a response of voided.

Thoughts?

Re: Transaction Details API - Testing different status responses

RichardH — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:13:38 GMT

Hello @rreynier

If you use the Error Generation Guide, it will create transactions with the conditions you specify which can be returned by the transaction details API.

Richard

Re: Transaction Details API - Testing different status responses

rreynier — Sat, 15 Nov 2014 00:45:38 GMT

How would a replicate a "voided" or returned (ach) result?

Re: Transaction Details API - Testing different status responses

rreynier — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:01:46 GMT

To bring this back to the top:

Is there a way to replicate a "returned" ach transaction?

Re: Transaction Details API - Testing different status responses

RichardH — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:28:58 GMT

Hello @rreynier,

It is currently not possible to simulate returned ACH transactions in the sandbox. However, if you look in the eCheck.Net Developer Guide, you can find a list of eCheck.Net Return Codes starting on page 15.

You are welcome to submit this to our Ideas forum, so others can add their votes to yours.

Richard