<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: A couple quirks with updateHeldTransactionRequest in Integration and Testing</title>
    <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/A-couple-quirks-with-updateHeldTransactionRequest/m-p/60391#M34927</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/22246"&gt;@CoreyC&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Hoo boy. Thanks for the heads up on that. I've got it fixed in our doc system, and the change should be live in another week or so.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. That wording is confusing, because it's referring to transaction as your request being successful. It's trying to say something like "The interaction you've had with the API has resulted in us successfully delivering a response back to you", but it could probably do that better. I've noted this for future discussion internally on how we can reword these things.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:20:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-07T23:20:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A couple quirks with updateHeldTransactionRequest</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/A-couple-quirks-with-updateHeldTransactionRequest/m-p/60349#M34895</link>
      <description>&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Documentation shows&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier,monospace"&gt;refTransId&lt;/FONT&gt; coming before &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier,monospace"&gt;action&lt;/FONT&gt; in the "Request" tab and they should be switched.&amp;nbsp; We all know what a stickler you guys are for our parameters being in order... :)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In the response, if you submit action=decline, the message&amp;nbsp;in the TransactionResponse&amp;nbsp;says, "This transaction has been approved." even if it's declined.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:24:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/A-couple-quirks-with-updateHeldTransactionRequest/m-p/60349#M34895</guid>
      <dc:creator>CoreyC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-03T00:24:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A couple quirks with updateHeldTransactionRequest</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/A-couple-quirks-with-updateHeldTransactionRequest/m-p/60391#M34927</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/22246"&gt;@CoreyC&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Hoo boy. Thanks for the heads up on that. I've got it fixed in our doc system, and the change should be live in another week or so.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. That wording is confusing, because it's referring to transaction as your request being successful. It's trying to say something like "The interaction you've had with the API has resulted in us successfully delivering a response back to you", but it could probably do that better. I've noted this for future discussion internally on how we can reword these things.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:20:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/A-couple-quirks-with-updateHeldTransactionRequest/m-p/60391#M34927</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-07T23:20:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

