<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic eCheck authonly transaction is successful?! in Integration and Testing</title>
    <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/eCheck-authonly-transaction-is-successful/m-p/84868#M53419</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have accidentally stumbled across some suprising behavior regarding bank account transactions, and I'm wondering if this is expected. It isn't documented anywhere that I can tell.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically, I'm using AcceptJS to create a nonce for a checking account, and then executing a $1 authOnly transaction using the payment nonce (I'm using the java sdk).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was expecting the auth only transaction to fail, but it succeeds and returns a transaction number. The transaction shows up in my sandbox as an unsettled transaction for $1. Transaction Type is Authorization Only, and Card Type is eCheck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is this known, supported behavior?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What will happen to these auth only echeck transactions -- does it actually get included in the nacha file?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this is supported behavior , we would actually find it useful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:00:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>galen1236</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-11T12:00:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>eCheck authonly transaction is successful?!</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/eCheck-authonly-transaction-is-successful/m-p/84868#M53419</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have accidentally stumbled across some suprising behavior regarding bank account transactions, and I'm wondering if this is expected. It isn't documented anywhere that I can tell.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically, I'm using AcceptJS to create a nonce for a checking account, and then executing a $1 authOnly transaction using the payment nonce (I'm using the java sdk).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was expecting the auth only transaction to fail, but it succeeds and returns a transaction number. The transaction shows up in my sandbox as an unsettled transaction for $1. Transaction Type is Authorization Only, and Card Type is eCheck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is this known, supported behavior?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What will happen to these auth only echeck transactions -- does it actually get included in the nacha file?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this is supported behavior , we would actually find it useful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:00:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/eCheck-authonly-transaction-is-successful/m-p/84868#M53419</guid>
      <dc:creator>galen1236</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-11T12:00:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

