<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Partial Auth Refunds (credit tx type) in Integration and Testing</title>
    <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Partial-Auth-Refunds-credit-tx-type/m-p/13998#M8296</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the response on this!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:16:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SublymeRick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-27T21:16:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Partial Auth Refunds (credit tx type)</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Partial-Auth-Refunds-credit-tx-type/m-p/13864#M8230</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just finished implementing partial authorizations, however I need to know what modifications I need to make to our "refunding" scripts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Can I preform a "CREDIT" based on a split tender ID and have authorized.net decide which card to refund what amount from? (is this even possible)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Or do I need to submit X amount from X card with X txid, and X amount from X card with this Tx id?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See I save the order with the split tender id, and each subsequent card/amount/txid is saved independantly so I can handle this either way. So which way is the best / correct way to do this, or is either way fine?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, the system does support more than just one split right? I programmed&amp;nbsp; my processing side to continuously prompt for more payment sources until the total amount has been authorized. The testing area seemed to handle it but I just wanted to double check.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lastly, what is with this posting form? Why does this box not wrap at the edge and just continue to horizontally scroll as I type? Highly annoying. FF4.01...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Partial-Auth-Refunds-credit-tx-type/m-p/13864#M8230</guid>
      <dc:creator>SublymeRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-21T21:08:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Partial Auth Refunds (credit tx type)</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Partial-Auth-Refunds-credit-tx-type/m-p/13888#M8242</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This brings up an additional question...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I'm doing a PRIOR_AUTH_CAPTURE using the split_tender_id from the AUTH_ONLY previously executed, I know I can just do it like normal except give the split tender id instead of the transaction id like I do normally, how ever if the amount changes, like shipping cost was discounted or something like that that, and the amount needed to prior_auth_capture is lower than the total authorized amount, can I just capture the new amount using the split tender id? Or will I have to specify every single card / txid and amont from each doing separate calls to the API?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:14:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Partial-Auth-Refunds-credit-tx-type/m-p/13888#M8242</guid>
      <dc:creator>SublymeRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-22T00:14:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Partial Auth Refunds (credit tx type)</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Partial-Auth-Refunds-credit-tx-type/m-p/13932#M8263</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In both scenarios that you describe, you would need to submit multiple requests.&amp;nbsp; Authorize.Net will only capture or refund the full transaction amounts when submitting a split tender ID instead of a transaction ID.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Partial-Auth-Refunds-credit-tx-type/m-p/13932#M8263</guid>
      <dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-23T21:41:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Partial Auth Refunds (credit tx type)</title>
      <link>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Partial-Auth-Refunds-credit-tx-type/m-p/13998#M8296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the response on this!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:16:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.developer.cybersource.com/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Partial-Auth-Refunds-credit-tx-type/m-p/13998#M8296</guid>
      <dc:creator>SublymeRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-27T21:16:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

