Showing ideas with status Under Review.
Show all ideas
Status:
Under Review
Submitted on
03-05-2018
02:28 PM
Submitted by
knightcode
on
03-05-2018
02:28 PM
We just started using the in-person iOS SDK. Holy Hell, the UI is bad. Can you make the signature box transparent, so that it matches whatever we set the background color to. Then just give it a border that's the same color as the text font color (if you don't want to add another setting). And can we set the font? Or can you pick a better one, please.
... View more
In createTransactionRequest we are able to create a new customer profile from data which was sent in this API call by setting <createProfile>true</createProfile> flag: <profile>
<createProfile>true</createProfile>
</profile> Since customer is only being created after transaction is set, and not assosiated with it, any of GetTransactionList, GetUnsettledTransactionList and GetTransactionDetails API calls will respond with empty customer profile field. Flag <createProfile> only declares that profile will be created, so this is an expected behavior. But also it might be usefull to associate customer profile with transaction where it was created. A new flag might be added to avoid changing <createProfile> strict behavior, and at the same time add more flexibility to this call: <profile>
<createProfile>true</createProfile>
<associateWithTransaction>true</associateWithTransaction>
</profile> , or something similar.
... View more
A credit card payment can only be refunded for up to 120 days without having to resort to using ECC. ECC is cumbersome and creates PCI compliance hassles. Competitor gateways can often refund transactions up to a year after they happen. Please extend the non-ECC refund window to 365 days.
... View more
There are many solutions providers that are trying to integrate with a payment processors to give their clients a robust system - not only for people paying them, but for paying their employees as well - via direct Deposit. For example non profits (and many for profits) need to accept money via online (donations or payments for products and services). Authorize.net has this portion down - Hooray!!! The part we need in a full CRM - Enterprise system is the ability to make payroll direct deposits to our employees. Churches and other companies use software like what we offer to keep all their systems running but we need a processor in the back end that can handle any type of money movement ie - one bank to many banks (direct deposit), receiving money from multiple banks to one bank (paying for something online from multiple clients), making payments to vendors, and so on. Thanks for listening. Jay
... View more
Status:
Under Review
Submitted on
09-06-2016
08:07 AM
Submitted by
mkienenb
on
09-06-2016
08:07 AM
One of the problems with using CIM hosted forms is that it's difficult to determine what profile information has changed (payment profiles added or edited). Another issue is that it's difficult to provide an audit trail which identifies who initiated the changes. One possibility that could address these issues is specifying some kind of reference id (not the per-transaction refid field) in the getHostedProfilePageRequest which would be assigned to each payment profile (or shipping address, although this is not something I use) which the end user created or edited using this token. Or it could be the token itself. Then return that identifier for each payment profile (or shipping address) returned by getCustomerPaymentProfileListRequest. End-developers can easily identify which payment profiles were modified by a specific token consumer. We can also provide an audit trail of which token consumer modified a record most recently.Comments?
... View more
Status:
Under Review
Submitted on
09-01-2016
01:50 PM
Submitted by
ToddOliver
on
09-01-2016
01:50 PM
Currently, there is no method via the API to validate and reconcile ACH payments from echeck transactions made to our bank account. Payments received into our bank account do not contain any tracking numbers or relation to which batch(s) are included in the payment. Therefore, we cannot finilize the confirmation of payment per person based on teh ACH deposit. According to Authorize.net support, the only way to determine which batches are included in a given payment is to manually review the Funding Calculation immediately prior to the ACH transaction. We find this cumbersome and unrealistic in a production environment. Instead, we propose additions to the API. List ACH deposits: to provide a full listing of ACH deposits to the merchant account with deposited amount by date range List ACH deposit batches: Per ACH deposit, list batches included in the ACH deposit with $ amount per batch Currently, there is a 9 digit number provided in the ACH deposit info from Authorize.net. We assume that number is an ACT payment id. The API should provide a method to query by that number to retrieve included batch id numbers, transaction amounts, and deposit amounts. Without at lease 1 & 2 above, there is no API (a.k.a. automated) method to validate receipt of funds per batch and transaction which leaves the merchant exposed to missing failed deposits or other ACH issues.
... View more
