I am having trouble doing split_tender transactions. I am using DirectPost because it is easier for me to work with at this time. Here is the content of my first post to:
https://test.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
x_allow_partial_auth => 1
x_description => Mine
x_relay_response => TRUE
x_delim_data => FALSE
x_relay_url => http://XXXXXX.com/cgi-bin/transact_reflect
x_invoice_num => 1234
x_email => julian at jlbprof dot com
x_zip => 46225
x_city => Houston
x_company => Julian Brown
x_version => 3.1
x_address => 123 Fake St.
x_card_num => 4111111111111111
x_exp_date => 10/2015
x_last_name => Brown
x_first_name => Julian
x_type => AUTH_CAPTURE
x_state => TX
x_cust_id => 3219
x_method => CC
x_country => US
x_phone => 713 555 1212
x_email_merchant => TRUE
x_login => XXXXXX
x_amount => 121.00
x_fp_sequence => 455668
x_fp_timestamp => 1357845637
x_fp_hash => 1e8d49130782e73c01568852c2d379c0
I am using a zip code trigger to get this to partially approve for $1.23 here is the response:
x_response_code :4:
x_response_reason_code :295:
x_response_reason_text :The amount of this request was only partially approved on the given prepaid card. An additional payment is required to fulfill the balance of this transaction.:
x_avs_code :Y:
x_auth_code :ALTRPC:
x_trans_id :2182619104:
x_method :CC:
x_card_type :Visa:
x_prepaid_balance_on_card ::
x_prepaid_requested_amount :121.00:
x_account_number :XXXX1111:
x_first_name :Julian:
x_last_name :Brown:
x_company :Julian Brown:
x_address :123 Fake St.:
x_city :Houston:
x_state :TX:
x_zip :46225:
x_country :US:
x_phone :713 555 1212:
x_fax ::
x_email :julian at jlbprof dot com:
x_invoice_num :1234:
x_description :Mine:
x_type :auth_capture:
x_cust_id :3219:
x_ship_to_first_name ::
x_ship_to_last_name ::
x_ship_to_company ::
x_ship_to_address ::
x_ship_to_city ::
x_ship_to_state ::
x_ship_to_zip ::
x_ship_to_country ::
x_amount :1.23:
x_tax :0.00:
x_duty :0.00:
x_freight :0.00:
x_tax_exempt :FALSE:
x_po_num ::
x_MD5_Hash :686F714EF3E47E6EF2FB87D55D385D52:
x_cvv2_resp_code ::
x_cavv_response :2:
x_split_tender_id :109312:
x_split_tender_status :Held:
x_test_request :false:
I say way cool, and prepare my 2nd transaction
x_description => Mine
x_relay_response => TRUE
x_delim_data => FALSE
x_relay_url => http://XXXXXX.com/cgi-bin/transact_reflect
x_invoice_num => 1234
x_email => julian at jlbprof dot com
x_zip => 46225
x_city => Houston
x_company => Julian Brown
x_version => 3.1
x_address => 123 Fake St.
x_card_num => 4111111111111111
x_exp_date => 10/2015
x_last_name => Brown
x_first_name => Julian
x_type => AUTH_CAPTURE
x_state => TX
x_cust_id => 3219
x_method => CC
x_country => US
x_phone => 713 555 1212
x_email_merchant => TRUE
x_login => XXXXXX
x_split_tender_id => 109312
x_amount => 119.77
x_fp_sequence => 45563269
x_fp_timestamp => 1357845367
x_fp_hash => fde9d4ddd1d2471fa5c3701a84c8b4ff
Here I added the split tender id from my previous transaction and set the amount to the difference from the previous transaction and the originally requested amount.
I update the fingerprint by normal rules and here is the failed response:
x_response_code :3|4:
x_response_reason_code :99|295:
x_response_reason_text :This transaction cannot be accepted.|The amount of this request was only partially approved on the given prepaid card. An additional payment is required to fulfill the balance of this transaction.:
x_avs_code :P|Y:
x_auth_code :|ALTRPC:
x_trans_id :0|2182619104:
x_method :CC|CC:
x_card_type :|Visa:
x_prepaid_balance_on_card :|:
x_prepaid_requested_amount :|121.00:
x_account_number :|XXXX1111:
x_first_name ::
x_last_name ::
x_company ::
x_address ::
x_city ::
x_state ::
x_zip ::
x_country ::
x_phone ::
x_fax ::
x_email ::
x_invoice_num ::
x_description ::
x_type :auth_capture:
x_cust_id ::
x_ship_to_first_name ::
x_ship_to_last_name ::
x_ship_to_company ::
x_ship_to_address ::
x_ship_to_city ::
x_ship_to_state ::
x_ship_to_zip ::
x_ship_to_country ::
x_amount :119.77|1.23:
x_tax :0.00:
x_duty :0.00:
x_freight :0.00:
x_tax_exempt :FALSE:
x_po_num ::
x_MD5_Hash :5073253C8BE7569B7EA186FA2DCC9079:
x_cvv2_resp_code :| :
x_cavv_response :|:
x_split_tender_id :109312:
x_split_tender_status :Held:
x_test_request :false:
99 is the rejection code that you get if your fingerprint is incorrect. I looked at this nine ways to Sunday and cannot figure this out. One thing I do know is if I remove the x_split_tender_id field the transaction succeeds which should indicate that the fingerprint is correct:
x_description => Mine
x_relay_response => TRUE
x_delim_data => FALSE
x_relay_url => http://XXXXXX.com/cgi-bin/transact_reflect
x_invoice_num => 1234
x_email => julian at jlbprof dot com
x_zip => 46225
x_city => Houston
x_company => Julian Brown
x_version => 3.1
x_address => 123 Fake St.
x_card_num => 4111111111111111
x_exp_date => 10/2015
x_last_name => Brown
x_first_name => Julian
x_type => AUTH_CAPTURE
x_state => TX
x_cust_id => 3219
x_method => CC
x_country => US
x_phone => 713 555 1212
x_email_merchant => TRUE
x_login => XXXXX
x_amount => 119.77
x_fp_sequence => 45563269
x_fp_timestamp => 1357845367
x_fp_hash => fde9d4ddd1d2471fa5c3701a84c8b4ff
And the response when I remove the split tender id.
x_response_code :1:
x_response_reason_code :1:
x_response_reason_text :This transaction has been approved.:
x_avs_code :Y:
x_auth_code :GVAVPN:
x_trans_id :2182619163:
x_method :CC:
x_card_type :Visa:
x_account_number :XXXX1111:
x_first_name :Julian:
x_last_name :Brown:
x_company :Julian Brown:
x_address :123 Fake St.:
x_city :Houston:
x_state :TX:
x_zip :46225:
x_country :US:
x_phone :713 555 1212:
x_fax ::
x_email :julian at jlbprof dot com:
x_invoice_num :1234:
x_description :Mine:
x_type :auth_capture:
x_cust_id :3219:
x_ship_to_first_name ::
x_ship_to_last_name ::
x_ship_to_company ::
x_ship_to_address ::
x_ship_to_city ::
x_ship_to_state ::
x_ship_to_zip ::
x_ship_to_country ::
x_amount :119.77:
x_tax :0.00:
x_duty :0.00:
x_freight :0.00:
x_tax_exempt :FALSE:
x_po_num ::
x_MD5_Hash :17F7B2BB753545EA84DCDD6F634F228D:
x_cvv2_resp_code ::
x_cavv_response :2:
x_test_request :false:
The second transaction should clearly indicate that the fingerprint is correct yet it fails because of fingerprint. Does the presence of a split tender id change the rules for calculating the fingerprint?
Thanx
Julian
