Hello,
I have been assured by the people who set up our merchant account that the ECHECK limit is set at $400. I am using AIM as my integration method and everything works as expected until the check amount exceeds $100, then the transaction is declined with a response code of 2. My x_echeck_type = WEB. My login URL is https://test.authorize.net . Would that make a difference in the allowed check limit?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-18-2010 07:07 AM
We heard this question again from another developer and wanted to remind our community that eCheck.Net is enabled for all sandbox accounts but with low transaction limits: $100 per transaction and $5000.00 monthly. These limits in the sandbox are arbitrary and allow developers to easily test a sucessful transaction (within limits), or decline (above limits).
You can always send a request to raise these limits. If you don’t, it will give you a straight decline if you try to run a transaction that is more than your transaction size limit.
Richard
07-17-2012 11:34 AM - edited 07-28-2014 01:27 PM
If you dont get an answer to this I would suggest emailing developer@authorize.net as it is a very valid question.
11-19-2010 07:21 AM
Thanks for getting back to me. I'll wait a little longer but in the meantime, I'll email my question.
11-19-2010 11:54 AM
Hi there,
we're running into the exact same problem right now - were you ever able to figure out the reason behind the behavior ?
Thanks
Stephan
02-03-2011 02:13 PM
We heard this question again from another developer and wanted to remind our community that eCheck.Net is enabled for all sandbox accounts but with low transaction limits: $100 per transaction and $5000.00 monthly. These limits in the sandbox are arbitrary and allow developers to easily test a sucessful transaction (within limits), or decline (above limits).
You can always send a request to raise these limits. If you don’t, it will give you a straight decline if you try to run a transaction that is more than your transaction size limit.
Richard
07-17-2012 11:34 AM - edited 07-28-2014 01:27 PM
It makes absolutely no sense to put transaction limits on a developer sandbox, nor does it make any sense to have to request that those limits be increased.
07-28-2014 12:32 PM
Hello @bitNine
Thanks for the feedback.
The purpose of limits is to provide developers a method to easily test accepted and declined transactions. Any transaction below the limits in the sandbox will process, and any transactions above the limit will decline.
Richard
07-28-2014 01:30 PM
If this standard is going to be maintained, it should be better documented and/or highlighted as a warning within the sandbox. My team wasted several hours debugging our application due to echecks being decliened, when the cause was the sandbox declining all charges over $100.
If you're going to impment a standard for the convience of developers, I suggest you do it in a way that doesn't waste hours of developers time.
12-16-2014 09:17 PM
I also wasted about 30 minutes debugging this before I found this post. I would highly recommend the error code include that sandbox accounts will decline transactions over $100.
01-26-2015 09:23 AM